Protecting Your Fourth Amendment Constitutional Rights In Search And Seizure Cases

If you have been arrested for or are under investigation for a criminal offense, it does not necessarily mean you will be convicted. Law enforcement must follow strict Fourth Amendment restrictions against unreasonable warrantless searches and seizures. If they do not, then the evidence is inadmissible.

The police often go beyond the legal boundaries of where they can search for drugs or contraband. You have privacy rights that the police cannot violate. If the evidence is inadmissible, then your case should be dismissed.

No matter how serious the charges or how strong the evidence, you should never give up hope. We can help you.

Result: Motion to Suppress Evidence in each case GRANTED and both CASES DISMISSED . Charges: Two counts of 3rd Degree Possession of a Controlled Substance in a Drug Free School Zone. The police failed to comply with protocol in order to make a felony arrest in a school zone. We properly asserted K.L.’s Constitutional rights and as a result, both 2nd Degree Felony cases were dismissed. State of Texas vs. K.L.

We Know How To Assert Your Constitutional Rights

In every case, the Fourth Amendment gives citizens protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The founders of our country were tired of the militia stopping them at a whim and searching them and invading their houses. So, they put an end to that in the U.S. Constitution, which is still in full effect.

The Constitution guarantees that you have an expectation of privacy. It greatly restricts the ability of the police to search your home, car, apartment, dorm room or property without a warrant. The Fourth Amendment even protects you when you are on public property.

Contact Us Immediately

Do not fool yourself by hoping your criminal problems will go away. They will not. Pick up your phone and call us right now at 972-608-0335, or send us an email. Our experienced 4th Amendment defense attorneys are ready to start fighting for you immediately. Each moment that goes by is bad for you, and good for the prosecution.

The best way to predict your future are the results we have achieved in the past.

Email Us Now

Case Results

State of Texas vs. S.M.: Charge: Motion to Adjudicate—Manufacturing/Delivery of a Controlled Substance PG 1 more than 4G less than 200G'.

Client was facing up to 99 years on a 1st Degree Felony after probation filed to revoke his probation. At the first appearance after hiring us, the Warrant was withdrawn, the MTA dismissed, and probation was reinstated. Result: MTA DISMISSED & PROBATION CONTINUED.

State of Texas vs. L.P.: Charge: Possession of Marijuana.

Client was caught red handed with the drugs. Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. A.C.: Charge: Possession of Controlled Substance PG1 less than 1G

A.C. was caught with cocaine in his car when he was pulled over by Dallas Police. Result: CASE DISMISSED LESS THAN A MONTH AFTER HIRING OUR FIRM.

State of Texas vs. K.L.: Charges: Two counts of 3rd Degree Possession of a Controlled Substance in a Drug Free School Zone.

Client faced 20 years confinement if convicted with sentences stacked and considering client's extensive criminal history that was a possibility. Result: Motion to Suppress Evidence in each case GRANTED and both CASES DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. M.D.: Charge: Delivery of Controlled Substance Penalty Group 1 Less than 200 Grams

Client faced 20 years in prison if convicted. Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. C.B.: Charge: Felony Delivery of Marijuana Less than 5 Pounds in a Drug Free School Zone

Facing 10 years confinement for delivery in a school zone, after Motion to Suppress was filed client's case was reduced to misdemeanor. Result: REDUCTION TO CLASS B MISDEMEANOR DEFERRED ADJUDICATION.

State of Texas vs. C.K. Charge: Possession of Marijuana.

While on probation for several other offenses, client was handcuffed, arrested for Possession of Marijuana, and driven to jail in the back of a police squad car. Client admitted in open court to escaping out of the back of the squad car when it stopped and the officer's attention was diverted and avoiding apprehension by the police despite an extensive search. Result: PROBATION EXTENDED WITHOUT REVOCATION AND MARIJUANA CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. D.D. Charge: Sexual Assault

A woman that our client worked with was mad at D.D. and called the police and claimed that he sexually assaulted her at work. A detective contacted him, but we had represented him before on a civil matter so he scheduled an appointment with us first. Based on the allegations in this case, the detective would most certainly have had D.D. arrested if he would have spoken with him first and he would be facing 20 years confinement. Instead, we intervened and he was never arrested.Result: GRAND JURY "NO-BILLED" THE CASE; CHARGES DROPPED.

State of Texas vs. L.J.: Charge: Possession of Marijuana.

Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. J.P.: Charge: Possession of Marijuana.

Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. L.V.: Charge: Possession of Marijuana.

Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. S.B.: Charge: Possession of Marijuana.

Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. L.J.: Charge: Possession of Marijuana.

Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. V.T.: Charge: Possession of Marijuana.

Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. T.A.: Charge: Possession of Marijuana.

Client was caught red handed smoking pot in a parked car and admitted to the crime. Result: PRE-TRIAL DIVERSION GRANTED.

State of Texas vs. S.M.: Charge: Motion to Adjudicate—Manufacturing/Delivery of a Controlled Substance PG 1 greater than 4G less than 200G.

Client was facing up to 99 years on a 1st Degree Felony after probation filed to revoke his probation. At the first appearance after hiring us, the Warrant was withdrawn, the MTA dismissed, and probation was reinstated. Result: MTA DISMISSED & PROBATION CONTINUED.

State of Texas vs. A.C.: Charge: Possession of Controlled Substance PG1 less than 1G.

A.C. was caught with cocaine in his car when he was pulled over by Dallas Police. Result: CASE DISMISSED LESS THAN A MONTH AFTER HIRING OUR FIRM.

State of Texas vs. K.L.: Charges: Two counts of 3rd Degree Possession of a Controlled Substance in a Drug Free School Zone.

Client faced 20 years confinement if convicted with sentences stacked and considering client's extensive criminal history that was a possibility. Result: Motion to Suppress Evidence in each case GRANTED and both CASES DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. M.D.: Charge: Delivery of Controlled Substance Penalty Group 1 Less than 200 Grams

Client faced 20 years in prison if convicted. Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. C.B. Charge: Felony Delivery of Marijuana Less than 5 Pounds in a Drug Free School Zone

Facing 10 years confinement for delivery in a school zone, after Motion to Suppress was filed client's case was reduced to misdemeanor. Result: REDUCTION TO CLASS B MISDEMEANOR DEFERRED ADJUDICATION.

State of Texas vs. C.K.: Charge: Possession of Marijuana.

While on probation for several other offenses, client was handcuffed, arrested for Possession of Marijuana, and driven to jail in the back of a police squad car. Client admitted in open court to escaping out of the back of the squad car when it stopped and the officer's attention was diverted and avoiding apprehension by the police despite an extensive search. Result: PROBATION EXTENDED WITHOUT REVOCATION AND MARIJUANA CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. L.J.: Charge: Possession of Marijuana.

Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. J.P.: Charge: Possession of Marijuana.

Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. L.V.: Charge: Possession of Marijuana.

Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. S.B.: Charge: Possession of Marijuana.

Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. L.J.: Charge: Possession of Marijuana.

Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. V.T.: Charge: Possession of Marijuana.

Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. T.A.: Charge: Possession of Marijuana.

Client was caught red handed smoking pot in a parked car and admitted to the crime. Result: PRE-TRIAL DIVERSION GRANTED.

State of Texas vs. M.K.: Charge: FELONY PCS (TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL) AKA "Shatter"

M.K. was pulled over in West Texas on a trip back from Colorado. He was speeding 80 in a 65, so the stop was legitimate. After M.K. consented to the search of his car, the State Trooper immediately found THC "Shatter." Having been arrested for the felony possession case, M.K. immediately came in and hired Mr. Pelley. At the first appearance, Mr. Pelley helped him avoid any jail time and a felony conviction. Result: Pre-Trial Diversion & Felony Drug Case to be Dismissed.

- M.K.