THEFT CRIMES ARE MORE SERIOUS THAN YOU MAY THINK.

Theft Crimes

There are four types of criminal convictions that will affect your long-term ability to obtain employment:

  • Any Felony offense
  • Sex offenses
  • Violent offenses
  • Theft offenses (often called “crimes of moral turpitude”)

I. Felony: Employers know that if they hire a convicted felon and he/she misbehaves, they are going to get sued.

II. Sex Offenses: Employers know that if they hire a sex offender, and the convicted sex offender acts improperly towards a co-worker or customer, they are going to get sued.

III. Violent Offenses: Employers know that if they hire a violent offender, and the violent offender later threatens or hits a customer or co-worker when a heated issue arises, they are going to get sued.

IV. Theft Offenses: Employers do not want employees stealing out of their cash register, so they are not going to hire someone with a theft conviction.

If you are charged with a theft crime, then you need a defense team with our record of success. Our theft defense team has been getting these types of charges dismissed and arrest records expunged since 1974.

State of Texas vs. M.B.:Charge: Theft Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. P.R.:Charge: Theft Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. S.P.:Charge: Theft Result: CASE DISMISSED.

We fight hard to help our clients avoid convictions for theft crimes. We are often called on by good people who had a serious lapse in judgment and have been arrested for anything from Misdemeanor Shoplifting to First or Second Degree Felony Burglary of a Habitation. We do not judge. But, we do deliver results.

If you or someone you care about is under investigation or has been arrested, now is the time to contact an experienced criminal defense lawyer.

CALL OR E-MAIL PELLEY LAW OFFICE, L.L.P. TODAY

We encourage you to contact our offices immediately if you or someone you care about has been charged with a theft crime in North Texas. We know that the sooner we get involved in a case, the more options we have in mitigating the potential consequences. Your initial consultation with an experienced criminal defense attorney will be free. Do not wait. Call us at 972-608-0335 or 214-733-1775 now.

The most accurate way of predicting attorneys’ performance in the future is to examine the results they have achieved in the past.

Case Results

State of Texas vs. K.T. Charges: False Statement to Obtain Property or Credit Over $200.000.00

Client under investigation for 36 First (1ST) Degree allegations facing 99 years confinement on each charge for a potential exposure of 3,564 years in prison plus a minimum of 30 years confinement (not eligible for probation) in federal prison if convicted. Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. S.K. Charge: Theft

Result: CASE DISMISSED.

United States of America v. R.H.

1. Federal Investigation Allegations: Money Laundering, Wire Fraud, & Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud when client was not eligible for probation.

2. State of Texas indictment for Felony Theft:

Result: INVESTIGATION BY THE F.B.I. CONCLUDED WITHOUT INDICTMENT. FELONY THEFT CHARGES DISMISSED BEFORE TRIAL

State of Texas vs. C.R. : Charge: Aggravated Robbery

With no mask on in broad daylight client went into a gas station with a pistol and held up the clerk for the cash that was in the safe and his face was caught on a crystal clear video surveillance camera feed. Although facing 99 years confinement, our attorney at an open plea hearing in front of the judge convinced the Court to give him deferred adjudication probation rather than sentencing him to prison. Result: CLIENT RECEIVED DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION.

State of Texas vs. C.M. : Charge: Burglary of a Habitation

Client was caught and admitted to police that he was the primary actor in a series of burglaries of local dignitaries' homes. Client was facing 20 years confinement on each charge. Result: CASES DISMISSED.

State of Missouri vs. W.M. Charge: Felony Theft

Client was indicted in Missouri for felony theft and was offered 6 years imprisonment by the prosecution to the Missouri defense lawyer. A Texas resident, W.M. paid the Missouri attorney over $20,000 and the offer to W.M. never reduced. That Missouri attorney was advising W.M. he needed more money to continue to represent W.M. W.M. hired our firm for substantially less and after our attorney got permission from the Missouri judge to represent W.M. on the matter Pro Hac Vice, two weeks later the indictment was dismissed and all charges dropped. Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Nevada vs. A.I. Charge: Felony Theft by Check over $200,000

Client had hot check allegations over $200,00 out of Las Vegas and hired our firm. Through working with local counsel in order to save our client money, we were able to avoid any indictment. Result: CASES DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. T.C. Charge: Engaged in Organized Crime

Client was indicted as a primary party to a extensive criminal ring of burglaries in Collin CountyResult: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. R.K. Charge: Felony Theft

Client indicted for Felony theft that he was caught on tape committing and admitted to committing. Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. M.B. Charge: Theft

Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. P.R. Charge: Theft

Result: CASE DISMISSED.

State of Texas vs. S.P. Charge: Theft

Result: CASE DISMISSED.